Country needs nuclear power, Government insists

Author: By Martha Linden and Craig Woodhouse, Press Association

Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband acknowledged anxieties about
nuclear power but said it had a “relatively good” safety record in this

“The basic message here is, we can’t say no to all of the nuclear or all of
the low carbon fuels that are out there,” he told GMTV.

“We need nuclear, we need renewables, we need clean coal, we need all of those
things if we are going to make that transition to cleaner energy.”

Mr Miliband was speaking as he was due to announce a series of national policy
statements which would include a list of sites deemed suitable for new
nuclear developments.

Under changes to the planning laws, the Infrastructure Planning Commission
(IPC) will be able to speed through the proposals for new schemes if it
decided they fitted in with the policy statements.

But shadow energy secretary Greg Clark said that a simple ministerial
statement on the issue was inadequate and called for a Commons vote to give
the process “democratic legitimacy”.

“It is a national emergency and it’s been left far too late – we’ve known for
the last 10 years that most of our nuclear power fleet would come to the end
of its planned life,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

“So whatever happens with these statements we’ve got a black hole, but
actually we do need a different planning system, we need a fast track for
major items of infrastructure.

“The trouble with the way the Government’s doing it is, it has no democratic
component. The statements will just be read out to MPs without a vote and
the decisions will be taken by an unelected, unaccountable official.

“We think it should be a minister taking that decision, accountable to
Parliament, with the necessary time limit, about three months, so it doesn’t
delay the process.

“But it does need to have democratic legitimacy otherwise people will find
this an imposition that they will rail against.”

Mr Miliband said it would not be his decision about whether a new nuclear
power station is built in an area.

“It is not going to be a decision for me, it is going to be a decision for an
independent commission that will take a view about what the local feeling
is,” he said.

The proposed changes contrast with examples such as the six-year struggle to
steer the Sizewell B power station through the planning process, and is
likely to encourage foreign firms such as E.ON, RWE npower and EDF to
produce a new fleet of UK power stations that could be up and running by

Alongside nuclear power, the Government will issue draft policy statements
setting out the national need for new energy infrastructure including
renewables, fossil fuels, gas and infrastructure, as well as an overarching
energy statement.

Green groups expressed dismay at the prospect of new nuclear power and warned
the Government could be open to legal challenge if the statements do not
properly consider climate change.

They have also raised concerns that people will not be able to influence
decisions on major projects because schemes covered by the statements will
not be subject to public inquiry.

But the Government insists firms will have to work closely with local regions
and show they have consulted widely to gain approval.

The statements are expected to cite the finite nature of fossil fuels and the
pressing demands of climate change while making the case for nuclear power

Mr Miliband will also set out the financial and regulatory framework for
driving forward clean coal “carbon capture and storage” technology, but
Greenpeace said neither should be part of Britain’s future energy mix.

Robin Oakley, head of the group’s climate and energy campaign, said: “Nuclear
is a dangerous and expensive irrelevance to tackling climate change and
providing real energy security.

“We don’t need coal or nuclear, because proven green technologies such as wind
and combined heat and power stations can secure Britain’s energy needs,
create green jobs and slash our emissions.”

Friends of the Earth executive director Andy Atkins said the battle against
climate change should be at the core of all Government decisions to meet
commitments on reducing emissions.

And he added: “Building new nuclear reactors is not the answer to the
challenges of climate change and energy security.

“Nuclear power leaves a deadly legacy of radioactive waste that remains highly
dangerous for tens of thousands of years and costs tens of billions of
pounds to manage.

“And building new plants would divert precious resources from developing safe
renewable power, while doing little to bring about the urgent emissions
reductions that are desperately needed within the next decade.”

Mr Miliband, who will unveil the draft national policy statements to the
Commons, said they were crucial for the shape of Britain’s future energy

“We know the low-carbon transition is a huge challenge,” he said.

“We now need to move on to getting the actions in place to make it happen.

“That is why the national policy statements and Infrastructure Planning
Commission are important, because the truth is that we are not going to be
able to deliver a 21st century energy system with a 20th century planning

View full article here

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ezine Article Board


This author has published 5774 articles so far.

Comments are closed