A foray into the subject reveals that the answer is as well hidden from the
public as the aforementioned throbbing members. Before women start
brandishing placards, railing against government censorship and fighting for
their right to see erect members whenever they damn well please, it seems
that this is nothing to do with Whitehall. According to the Home Office, the
only legislation magazine publishers are bound by is the Obscene
Publications Act of 1959, which forbids them from including anything which
may “deprave or corrupt” the reader, and which makes no mention of
penises, erect or otherwise.
Broadcasting watchdog Ofcom says there is no ban on showing erections on TV. “There’s
no outright prohibition of it,” says Ofcom’s Ed Taylor “But if it
was shown it would have to be justified by the context”.
Meanwhile, the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) is even more
laissez-faire. Rumours that censors sit around clutching an atlas ? lest any
penis shown in a British film fail the legendary “Mull of Kintyre”
test, under which the penis should not exceed the angle equal to that made
by the Mull of Kintyre on maps of Scotland ? are not true. “It
never existed, it was an urban myth,” said Sue Clarke of the BBFC “There
are no rules against showing erections in ’18’ films.”
So, if there is nothing legally stopping erect phalluses being blown up across
double page spreads in magazines; why are sightings of them so rare? It
seems that it is printers and newsagents who are acting as our moral
guardians, with their refusal to stock magazines featuring the images. “Normally
censorship would be exercised by the WHSmith and retailers refusing to sell
them,” says Rowan Pelling, former editor of The Erotic Review. “But
of course you should be able to show erections. What is so terrifying about
All work and no play ? yeah right
Recording albums is such a hassle. You’d do anything to avoid it. Empty the
bins. Tackle the washing up. Alphabeticise your biscuit collection. That’s
the thinking of Radiohead front man Thom Yorke, anyway, who announced
earlier this week that he’s had it with all that long-play album business. “None
of us want to go through the creative hoo-ha,” he says. So it looks
like Radiohead’s 2007 In Rainbows, first released as a digital
download, will be their last traditional-format album. Yorke isn’t the only
musician perennially cooking up tea instead of GETTING BACK TO WORK. Amy
Winehouse is yet to follow up 2006’s Back to Black, because she’s too
busy getting back to St Lucia; but if you thought that’s work-shy, what
about Guns N’ Roses, whose anticlimactic 2008 record Chinese Democracy was
released after a 15-year hiatus. What were they doing? Trying to find a lost
amp in Slash’s hair?
Next time your boss asks you to do something, mention the “hoo-ha”
it’ll create. You’ll be as popular as an Axl Rose record.
Slap on your war paint
The barbecue summer is sullenly sodden, the euro is holiday-crushingly high ?
how’s a girl supposed to get a sun-kissed glow when the fates are conspiring
against her? Weep not, my pasty-faced friends. The boffins at L’Oréal have
come up with a new cosmetic that will not only make the most pallid
complexion zing but will give you an arts and crafts project to take your
mind of the weather.
Inspired, perhaps, by the phrases “war paint” and “slapping it
on”, the cosmetics giant has created “Roll’on Foundation”, a
gloriously thick base coat that comes with its very own dinky roller. Never
has painting and decorating been more fun ? and there’s no need for dust
sheets. Simply dip your applicator in ? Hit & Run recommends the
Vanilla Rosé shade, mainly for the joy of yet more gratuitous punctuation ?
and roll your summer blues (as well as your ghostly hue) away. Forget
upstarts like the vibrating mascara, this is 2009’s cosmetic masterpiece.
View full article here
Author: Ezine Article BoardThis author has published 5774 articles so far.