We went out to Helmand to mentor the Afghan National Police without
understanding the level they were at. We thought we would be arresting
people, helping them to police efficiently. Instead we were literally
training them how to point a gun on the ranges, and telling them why you
should not stop cars and demand “taxes”.
They had no understanding of the basics of what it means to be a policeman. We
expected to be teaching adults at a certain level and then realised we would
be changing nappies. Give them 20 rounds and they will hit the target once.
The first time I saw them I realised that they had almost no training; some of
them had very little ability. Their uniforms were dirty and didn’t fit.
Their weapon-cleaning was non-existent.
They certainly didn’t have a concept of being upstanding members of the
community. They had no loyalty, esprit de corps or cameraderie. That should
have been incorporated in their training. They did have pride ? because of
the power and status they felt.
How do you train this band of idiots and turn them into a force to be reckoned
with if they have no sense of loyalty, no sense of belonging?
The biggest problem was that we didn’t know who we were getting. There were no
security checks ? they were literally allowed to come into the compound and
we had to rely on the local chief of police, who recruited them. We kept a
close eye on them because we didn’t know or trust them ? it was for our own
Perhaps half of them genuinely wanted to try to make the community safe: they
had the right intention but the attention span of gnats. Twenty would turn
up one day, none the next, then 15, then suddenly a new face would appear.
It was difficult just getting them to a basic level, to do things like man a
post. They would take drugs, go to sleep, leave their post, have sex with
each other. Very few were vigilant or alert.
When we went out of camp to do stop-and-searches, we became sitting ducks ?
nothing more than bodyguards or babysitters while they worked.
British troops felt extremely vulnerable. If they were going out on patrol
they didn’t tell the Afghans where, so they couldn’t pass on the information
? they didn’t want improvised explosive devices (IEDs) laid in the area.
They didn’t trust them one bit.
There was an operation involving the Brits and the Afghan National Army to
clear Nad-e-Ali, and it cost lives. The police were left at checkpoints, but
within 48 hours all the checkpoints had been overrun or the police just
buggered off. As soon as the ground was won it was lost again.
The Afghan army are a lot more switched on. They have started to stand up for
themselves. But the police have not had the same investment. There is no
point in pushing the army through to clear ground if you leave a void behind
with the police.
Lives get lost for nothing.
The Afghan police are very good at understanding the environment and if the
atmospherics have changed because they are local: they know the area and the
people. They are also good at spotting IEDs, although some just pick them up
and walk off with them, or put them into the back of their vehicle.
Progress is being made, but it is extremely slow. I am convinced that a lot of
money has been wasted and people have lost their lives unnecessarily because
it was for a political end, and not a military decision. The British Army
has been pushed into doing something it should not be. This type of
mentoring role could be fulfilled by our Ministry of Defence police or
civilian coppers (in a secure compound).
A lot could be done without putting British soldiers’ lives at risk. They
should recruit the right Afghans, security check them, pay them regularly
and train them properly ? at least three months out of the area ? all before
the squaddie ever gets to see them.
The author’s identity has been withheld
View full article here
Author: Ezine Article BoardThis author has published 5773 articles so far.