Nature laid waste: The destruction of Africa

It was long shrouded in mystery, called “the Dark Continent” by
Europeans in awe of its massive size and impenetrable depths. Then its
wondrous natural riches were revealed to the world. Now a third image of
Africa and its environment is being laid before us ? one of destruction on a
vast and disturbing scale.

Using “before and after” satellite photos, taken in all 53
countries, UN geographers have constructed an African atlas of environmental
change over the past four decades ? the vast majority of it for the worse.

In nearly 400 pages of dramatic pictures, disappearing forests, shrinking
lakes, vanishing glaciers and degraded landscapes are brought together for
the first time, providing a deeply disturbing portfolio of devastation.

The atlas, compiled by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) at the
request of African environment ministers, and launched yesterday
simultaneously in Johannesburg and London, underlines how extensively
development choices, population growth, regional conflicts and climate
change are impacting on the natural world and the nature-based assets of the

The satellite photos, some of them spanning a 35-year period, offer striking
snapshots of environmental transformation in every country.

The purpose of the atlas is to inspire African governments to improve their
records as environmental custodians, and as such, its language and tone are
studiously neutral, generally referring to environmental “change”
rather than destruction. But although there are some examples given of
change for the better, the vast majority of the case studies are of
large-scale environmental degradation, and the atlas compilers freely accept
that this represents the true picture.

They write of “the swell of grey-coloured cities over a once-green
countryside; protected areas shrinking as farms encroach upon their
boundaries; the tracks of road networks through forests; pollutants that
drift over borders of neighbouring countries; the erosion of deltas; refugee
settlements scattered across the continent causing further pressure on the
environment; and shrinking mountain glaciers.”

For its visual impact, the atlas takes advantage of the latest space
technology and Earth observation science, including the 36-year-old legacy
of the US Landsat satellite programme, demonstrating the potential of
satellite data in monitoring ecosystems and changes to them.

The “before and after” shots show vividly just how vast the changes
have been, not only since the first Landsat satellite in 1972, but on much
shorter timescales. Deforestation is shown not only as mass forest
disappearance in countries such as Rwanda, but also as the insidious spread
of logging roads through once entirely untouched rainforests in countries
such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the replacement of natural
forest by bright green rubber and palm plantations in Cameroon.

Urban spread is illustrated not only by the dramatic expansion of the
Senegalese capital Dakar over the past half century, from a small urban
centre at the tip of the Cape Verde peninsula, to a metropolitan area with
2.5 million people spread over the entire peninsula, but by the rapid
development of a small town like Bangassou in the Central Africa republic,
now beginning to affect the nearby forest.

Shrinkage of mountain glaciers is shown only in the well-known case of Mount
Kilimanjaro, but also in the disappearing glaciers in Uganda’s Rwenzori
mountains, which decreased by 50 per cent between 1987 and 2003. And to the
well-known cases of the drying up of Lake Chad, and falling water levels in
Lake Victoria, the atlas adds new cases of disappearing water bodies like
the drying up of Lake Faguibine in Mali, as well as many examples of
desertification, unsustainable large-scale irrigation and degraded coastal

Put it all together and you have a picture that is hard to credit, so enormous
is the destruction. Statistically, the atlas finds that deforestation is a
major concern in no fewer than 35 African countries, including the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Nigeria and Malawi, among others.
Africa is losing more than four million hectares of forest every year ?
twice the world’s average deforestation rate.

That problem is closely followed in significance by major loss of biodiversity
[wildlife] which is occurring in 34 countries, such as Angola, Ethiopia,
Gabon and Mali. Land degradation is similarly a major worry for 32
countries, including Cameroon, Eritrea and Ghana, with some areas across the
continent said to be losing more than 50 metric tonnes of soil per hectare
per year.

The atlas shows that erosion, as well as chemical and physical damage, have
degraded about 65 per cent of the continent’s farmlands. In addition,
slash-and-burn agriculture is adding to the number of wildfires which are
naturally caused by Africa’s high prevalence of lightning.

Rapidly rising populations account for one of the principal pressures on the
natural resource base. Between 2000 and 2005, the atlas says, Africa’s
population grew by 2.32 per cent annually ? nearly double the global rate of
1.24 per cent per year. Twenty of the 30 fastest growing countries in the
world are in Africa, including Liberia, which has the highest annual growth
rate ? 4.8 per cent ? of any country in the world. In the next half century
Africa will have twice the population growth rate of any other region. This
means that more and more land must be devoted to agriculture, but as the
amount of available land is limited, the amount available per person is
swiftly shrinking. The atlas points out that in 1950 there were 13.5
hectares of land per person in Africa, but by 1990 this had shrunk to 4.7
hectares per person and by 2005 to 3.2 hectares per person ? while on
present population growth estimates, by 2050 the amount will be 1.5 hectares
per person.

And now, it says, climate change is emerging as a driving force behind many of
these problems and is likely to intensify the “already dramatic
transformations” taking place. Although Africa’s 965 million people
produce only 4 per cent of the world’s total greenhouse gas emissions, they
are likely to suffer disproportionately from the consequences of global
warming, not least because African nations’ ability to adapt to climate
change is relatively low.

One of the key points the atlas makes is that environmental degradation is
likely to have a higher human cost in Africa than in other regions, as
people on the continent live in closer relation to the natural world than
elsewhere: they are often directly dependent on the environment.

It was for African governments themselves to address the problem, said Marion
Cheatle, chief of UNEP’s Early Warning Branch, who introduced the atlas in
London. “In many places you have a problem of policies being enforced.
Not that policies and legislative instruments [to protect the African
environment] are not in place, but very often they’re only on paper, and
they don’t have the management to follow that really should be in place.”

View full article here

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ezine Article Board


This author has published 5774 articles so far.

Comments are closed