Author: By Alison Kershaw, Press Association
But others still received the marks because the examiner added the dot for the
pupil in red ink, the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) said.
The union urged heads to contact England’s exams regulator, Ofqual, about
marking inconsistencies as it published a list of problems raised by members.
It included concerns that wrong spellings had been marked right, while right
spellings had been marked wrong.
Heads also raised concerns that there was little consistency in marking, there
were clerical errors, and inadequate levels of care taken by some markers.
In one case, a headteacher reported that a child had been violently sick over
her paper 34 minutes into a 45 minute exam, the union said.
The head rang a helpline for guidance and was asked if he knew what question
the child had reached. He was then told the child could start a fresh paper
but must complete it in 11 minutes.
The child had been taken home.
The NAHT said headteachers should write to Kathleen Tattersall, chair of
Ofqual, because she had said she would listen to concerns over marking.
NAHT assistant secretary Ian Foster said: “The bureaucracy and stress
surrounding these outmoded tests, compounded by clear examples of poor or
inadequate marking, can be dispiriting for pupils and parents, and can
potentially put school leaders’ careers on the line, particularly if the
school is in an Ofsted category, which may in itself be as a result of
flawed data based on wrongly levelled marking.”
Last year, just over a fifth of English papers taken by 14-year-olds were sent
back for review, following the marking fiasco.
Appeals are not expected to be as high this year, although teaching unions
have warned that as many as one in five results may be inaccurate.
There are usually more requests for reviews of English papers than other
subjects, as it is harder to mark.
Sats tests in English, maths and science were taken by 11-year-olds at the end
of May, and the results were delivered to schools on time at the beginning
In an interview with the Press Association at that time, Ms Tattersall said:
“Now the results are out, we will be listening to see if schools have
particular concerns, any concerns that they raise.”
The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority – the government body responsible
for the tests, and new contractor Edexcel were under pressure to meet the
deadline following last summer’s delays.
Schools Secretary Ed Balls scrapped Sats for 14-year-olds last October, and
the science test will be abolished from next year.
The NAHT and the National Union of Teachers (NUT) have announced plans to
ballot over boycotting next year’s Sats if they are not abolished.
View full article here
Author: Ezine Article BoardThis author has published 5773 articles so far.