Author: By Gavin Cordon, Press Association
Sir Patrick Cormack, who was a candidate for Commons Speaker, said their
salaries should be doubled – from £64,766 to more than £130,000 – in return
for scrapping their controversial second homes allowances.
Fellow grandee Douglas Hogg – whose schedule of expenses famously included the
cost of clearing the moat at his country home – also called for MPs to be
given six-figure salaries with “appropriate expenses”.
Chancellor Alistair Darling – standing in for Gordon Brown while he is on
holiday – said that such demands could not possibly be justified at a time
when ordinary people were struggling.
“At a time when everyone else is pulling in their belts, at a time when people
are worried about their jobs, some people are going part-time, MPs cannot be
treated any differently from anyone else,” he said.
The comments by the two MPs threaten once again to embarrass Tory leader David
Cameron after he was forced last week to reprimand senior frontbencher Alan
Duncan for suggesting MPs were living on rations in the wake of the expenses
Sir Patrick and Mr Hogg made their comments in submissions to the Committee on
Standards in Public Life – which is holding an inquiry into the system of
MPs expenses which have now been posted on the committee’s website.
In his submission, Sir Patrick argues such a big pay rise may be seen as
“politically unacceptable” but argues that it would be the best way to clean
up the system.
“I have reluctantly become convinced over the last few weeks that the most
effective way of restoring public confidence in Parliament is for there to
be a significant increase in Members’ salaries and an abolition of all
allowances, save for the allowance to pay for staff and a constituency
office,” he said.
“In order to ensure that Members could perform their parliamentary and
constituency duties effectively, and have where necessary a second home, the
salary of Members would have to be doubled at least and this might, yet
again, be deemed politically unacceptable, and there are, of course, pension
Mr Hogg – who is standing down at the next election – points out that there
are now more than 80 employees of Parliament who are paid more than MPs, who
now receive less than GPs, dentists, district judges and army brigadiers.
“The salary of MPs is now so low in both absolute and relative terms as to
deter members of professional and business classes from entering
Parliament,” he said.
“A parliamentary salary does not support the lifestyle to which most
professional and business classes aspire.
“My own conclusion is that in order not to deter the professional and business
classes from coming into the House of Commons, MPs should be paid a salary
of around £100,000 together with the appropriate expenses.”
In a statement, Sir Patrick said he accepted that it was not a “propitious
time” for such a big pay rise and had urged the committee to consider a
number of alternative recommendations.
“Foremost among these was that the second home should always be rented and
generally in London,” he said.
However senior Liberal Democrat Edward Davey said that it was “outrageous and
offensive” for such a senior MP as Sir Patrick to propose a doubling of
“He must be living on Planet Zog to think that doubling MPs’ salaries would
restore faith in Parliament,” he told London’s Evening Standard newspaper.
View full article here
Author: Ezine Article BoardThis author has published 5773 articles so far.